Showing posts with label Filibuster. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Filibuster. Show all posts

Thursday, June 16, 2016

The 4 moments you shouldn"t miss from Senate Democrats" marathon filibuster on gun control


Dramatic 15-Hour Filibuster Sparks Action on Gun Reform

The Fix"s Amber Phillips breaks down why Congress is unlikely to pass major gun control legislation, despite Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) filibustering for 15 hours on June 15. (Peter Stevenson/The Washington Post)

In the wee hours Thursday morning, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) ended his filibuster on gun control after nearly 15 hours because it looks like he got what Senate Democrats wanted: avote on gun-control legislation.

Murphy seized the Senate floor at 11:21 a.m. Eastern time Wednesday to demand Republicans allow the votes specifically to expand universal background checks and ban people on terrorist watch lists from buying guns.

He ended it at 2 a.m., saying Republicans had agreed.

It was one of the longer filibusters in history, clocking in ahead of Sen. Rand Paul"s (R-Ky.) 13-hour 2013 filibuster on drones and short of Sen. Ted Cruz"s (R-Tex.) 21-hour filibuster the same year on Obamacare. (A reminder on the rules: Senators conducting an old-school talking-style filibuster cannot sit, even when someone else is speaking, or eat or even leave to use the bathroom.)

Here are four big moments from the filibuster:

1. It appears to have ended successfully

Which is actually kind of rare in modern-day filibusters. As Murphy wrapped up his seizure of the Senate floor, he said he was closing down shop because Senate Republicans had agreed to allow votes on the two gun-control measures.

That"s very different from actually getting those things into law, mind you. Both these proposals the terrorist watch list and background checks have been voted on in the Senate in recent years, and both have failed. The Washington Post"s Karoun Demirjian reports that as Murphy was talking, backroom negotiations on a compromise on the terrorist watch list were fraying.

And it doesn"t seem like House Republicans are keen on taking up either piece of legislation:

But still, Murphy can claim some sort of success by asking for an actionable item (as opposed to conducting a filibuster in protest of something (cough, Rand Paul, and cough, Ted Cruz) and, after nearly 15 arduous hours, getting it.

2. The 35-plus senators who joined him

Around 8 p.m., Murphy looked up into the gallery and waved at his family, who had come to the Capitol to watch him speak, telling his young son by way of explanation that he wasn"t planningon seizing the Senate floor for an untold number of hours.

"I decided to do this essentially that morning," he told CBS on Thursday, "and over the course of the day, organically, almost every single Democratic senator decided to join me."

For a spur-of-the-moment event, Murphy"s filibuster sure attracted a lot of support from his colleagues, an indication of how united Democrats are on the issue.When your Fix author went to bed Wednesday night, she and C-SPAN cameras counted 37 senators having walked onto the floor to join Murphy, almost all of them Democrats, almost all of them in support of his filibuster.

Shortly before 8 p.m., Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) sent out a statement calling Murphy"s filibuster "courageous."

By 10 p.m. or 11 p.m., it seemed like every few minutes the doors to the Senate floor were swinging open and a new senator was walking in to help Murphy use up time on the floor, including powerful Democratic leaders such as Sens. Richard J. Durbin (Ill.) and Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.), who gave their own speeches on the need for gun-control laws and asked Murphy softball questions such as: How would banning people on the terrorist watch lists save lives? (I"m paraphrasing there, but you get the point.)

3. And one Republican*

This happened earlier in the day Wednesday, but it"s still worth noting. Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska you"ll remember him as the Senate"s only confirmed #NeverTrump guycame to the floor, not in support of the gun-control legislation Murphy was asking for but to engage Murphyin some actual debate about it:

In other words, Sassewanted to know what Murphy was referring to when saying "terror watch list" since there"s actually not just one. (There"s several, including a no-fly list, but it"s hard to pin down exactly how many since the FBI doesn"t willingly share those numbers.) Sasse also asked Murphy to talk about due process of banning people on these lists from buying guns, a major sticking point right now between Republicans and Democrats.

Apparently Twitter lit up, thinking Sasse was on the floor in support of the gun-control legislation, which he quickly had to clarify:

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) ended a 14-hour filibuster to force Republicans to vote on two gun control measures on June 16. He told the emotional story of a Sandy Hook victim before he left the floor. (AP)

*Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) came to the floor to speak in favor of some of the proposals, a story we"re writing shortly!

4. The filibuster"s final moment

It"s fair to say both sides of this debate would agree that one victim of gun violence is one too many. But throughout the filibuster and the whole gun debate, really Democrats highlighted the emotional pain of gun violence to make their case for more gun-control laws. (Since joining the Senate in 2013, Murphy has given 45 speeches on the floor sharing stories of victims of gun violence.)

As a weary Murphy wrapped up his filibuster around 2 a.m., he shared one more heartbreaking story: that of Dylan, a 6-year-old boy who was murdered along with 25 others at a leafy elementary school in Newtown, Conn., in 2013. First responders found Dylan in his teacher"s arms.

Murphy addressed the moment to his son, who was apparently still up in the gallery.

Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=us&usg=AFQjCNFCmPCeudKj2PdkpQVOV1ztxd2W4w&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&cid=52779133742638&ei=zhVjV8CsBpGT3AHd-7K4DA&url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/06/16/the-four-moments-you-shouldnt-miss-from-senate-democrats-marathon-filibuster-on-gun-control/

Continue Reading ..

Today"s Filibuster Mentioned Instagram"s Guns for Sale. Then #Gunsforsale Disappeared


A 14-Hour Filibuster Ends After GOP Agrees To Vote On Gun Control

Earlier today, SenatorChris Murphy of Connecticut, responding to the terror in Orlando, launched a filibusterin the hope of pushing Congress to work toward meaningful gun control. Fellow Democrats joined him throughout the afternoon and said all the things youd expect lawmakers to say. Then Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts took the floor.

We need to ban gun sales on sites on the Internet like Facebook and Instagram, he said. Right now, anyone can do a search for AK-47 or AR-15 or even guns for sale on Instagram and find guns for sale.

Hes right. Even now, years after the issue of gun sales onsocial media platforms came to light, you can still find plenty of them available. We searched #gunsforsale on Instagram minutes after Markeys comments and got nearly 8,000 results. The listings ranged from handguns of every description to a Heckler & Koch MP5 submachine gun.

But then, in real time, the results began to shift for people throughoutthe WIRED office. The number of results dwindled with subsequent searches, then disappeared entirely before reappearing a short time later with the addendum Recent posts from #gunsforsale are currently hidden because the community has reported some content that may not meet Instagrams community guidelines. Instagram, and its parent company Facebook, didnt say so, but it appeared that Markeyilluminated an unintended use of the platform and the company was struggling to keep it in check.

Instagrams guidelinesspecifically state thatthe platform is not a place to support or praise terrorism, organized crime, or hate groups. Offering sexual services, buying or selling firearms and illegal or prescription drugs (even if its legal in your region) is also not allowed. That may sound like a prohibition on listing guns for sale, but its not that simple. And while more recent #gunsforsale posts may be hidden, older ones still appearand may even be legit.

Back in March 2014, Facebook issued a statement that users will not be permitted to specify no background check required, nor can they offer to transact across state lines without a licensed firearms dealer. Essentially, that means no backroom deals, but posts about legitimate sales are fine.

In a statement to WIRED, a Facebook representative said, When we are made aware of content that promotes the private sale of regulated items whether in groups, on profiles, or on pages, it will be deleted. The same policies and enforcement apply to Instagram. We dont allow people to advertise gun sales on Facebook or Instagram. We also do not allow people to post offering to buy, sell, or trade firearms. We do allow stores or online retailers to post about a sale that would take place off of Facebook.

The Armory, located in Woburn, Massachusetts, does exactly that. Store director Matt DeVito says The Armory started posting items for sale on Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter two years ago. Its free marketing. The gun community is very active on lots of forms of social media, he says. It allows us to open up our clientele from just here in Massachusetts to sell across the entire country.

To complete a sale online, a licensed dealer like The Armory receives a direct inquiry from a buyer via contact information listed in the social media post. The store then ships the gun to a licensed dealer near the buyer, who must prove their identity before receiving the firearm.

But a cursory search of #gunsforsale or combinations including #guns, #forsale, #ak47, or #ar15 yielded results from users who clearly are not licensed firearms dealers, and who specifically offer to conduct business through direct messages within Instagram. That violates the platforms user agreement and terms of service, but unless they are reported by other Instagram usersor mentioned, say, on the Senate floorthose posts may never get removed.

Instagram is not intended to be a marketplace. But havingusers police ads that violate guidelines suggests there is an acceptable amount of content that evades detection. Its time for social media platforms to stop relying on users and start looking for these things themselves.

Additional reporting by Charley Locke and Angela Watercutter

Go Back to Top. Skip To: Start of Article.

Source: http://www.wired.com/2016/06/filibuster-instagram-gun-dealers/

Continue Reading ..